We live in an unfortunate time. It is difficult these days to access any real news about our planet's events without having to sift through a whole lot of garbage that, while important to a handful of people, doesn't affect the other 5.9999992 billion of us. At CNN.com right now, some of the "Latest News" in bold at the top of the page includes "Armed Bobby Knight contests a shot," "Surgery over; Youssif's biggest scar removed," "Fugitive gloats on Web about her wild life," and of course, "Body found in search for Internet porn star." Is this really necessary?Don't get me wrong; I have appropriate amounts of sympathy and disdain for whatever the staff at CNN.com wants me to have. News is a business, and if those are the stories that make the money and put food on Ted Turner's table, I won't begrudge him that. But I do object to the casualty with which the term "porn star" is tossed around these days. I would venture to say it is bandied about willy-nilly even more than Donna's tunnel back in Slough. Being a porn star used to mean something. Now anybody who takes their clothes off and shoves some cocks in a hole or two deserves to make the cover of a shitty magazine that I gloss over while waiting to pay for my groceries? Not that this would happen, but CNN.com would certainly have us believe it. What a sad state of affairs. Everybody knows those tabloid covers are reserved for actual movie stars, celebrity murderers and the elusive Bat Boy.
Anyway...
The woman in question here is a college student who "appeared nude on a popular adult Web site under the name Zoey Zane." Understandable. College is expensive, and the internet is an important source of entertainment for millions. Well, this woman disappeared last week and her dead body was found today, fifty miles away. This is obviously a horrible tragedy for her family, friends and the entire community. But does the rest of the world benefit from hearing about it?
And more importantly (to me), was she a porn star? Methinks not. Just by appearing in pornography (on the lowly internet, no less. ha!) she should not automatically be granted star status. When did being a nude model or XXX actor turn into being a porn star? Let's not put these people on a pedestal, OK? Do we not belittle the efforts of such pioneers as Jenna Jameson, Ron Jeremy and GWslutGetsFucked when we lazily devalue their moniker and lump them in with second-rate donkey show laser disc performers? We the public need to hold our porn stars to a higher standard than that.
Appearing as "Polka Dancer" in Groundhog Day might have been a good career move for Regina Prokop, but it didn't make her a star. Ambition, hard work and a whole lot of blowjobs make someone a star. And tragic as this woman's story is (Zoey Zane, not Regina Prokop), she was no porn star. Or at least, that's what people are saying. I've never even heard of porn.
For what it's worth, a little bird named Imdb told me Regina Prokop went on to small parts in such hits as Rudy and With Honors, and has had a fairly successful career as an extras casting assistant. Kudos to you, Regina!
I will leave you with this:



